Lake Powell Water Level Forecast

A plain-language explanation of the forecasting model, its data sources, and how well it performs.

What the Model Does

The model answers a simple question: where will the water level be next month?

It uses a mass-balance approach. Think of Lake Powell as a giant bathtub. Water flows in (snowmelt, rain, tributaries), water flows out (releases to the Grand Canyon, evaporation), and the level changes accordingly. In equation form:

Storage(next month) = Storage(current) + net change

"Storage" is measured in million acre-feet (MAF) — the volume of water in the reservoir. But most people think in terms of the water surface elevation (feet above sea level), so the model converts between the two using a lookup table published by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR).

Data Sources

All data is pulled from public federal sources. No proprietary data or API keys are required.

How the Forecast Works

Step 1: Converting Between Elevation and Storage

The BOR publishes a table mapping water elevation to storage volume. The model stores 20 points from this curve and interpolates linearly between them. Round-trip accuracy (elevation → storage → elevation) is better than 0.5 ft.

Key reference elevations: 3,700 ft is full pool (24.3 MAF), 3,490 ft is minimum power pool (5.0 MAF), and 3,370 ft is dead pool (1.7 MAF).

Step 2: Snowpack Predicts Spring Refill

Each spring, snowmelt in the Rocky Mountains feeds the Colorado River and refills Lake Powell. The amount of snow on the ground — specifically the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) on April 1 — is a strong predictor of how much water will flow in during spring and summer.

The model uses a linear regression of basin-average April 1 SWE (averaged across 10 stations) against the observed net storage gain from April through the summer peak (typically July). This is calibrated on 2020–2025 data, with R² = 0.899.

Net Gain (MAF) = 0.001732 × SWE − 6.037

A key design choice: the regression predicts the net effect — inflow minus releases minus evaporation — not just raw inflow. This is more useful because it directly predicts what happens to the lake level, not an intermediate quantity you'd need to further adjust.

Step 3: Monthly Mass Balance

Outside the spring refill window (August through April), the model applies average monthly net storage changes derived from 2020–2025 historical data. During these months, releases exceed inflow, so the lake steadily declines:

MonthNet Change (MAF)Notes
August−0.355Peak release month
September−0.182
October−0.073
November−0.147
December−0.225
January−0.273
February−0.221
March−0.163
April−0.041Transition to refill

During spring refill (May–July), the SWE-derived net gain is distributed across three months: 35% in May, 45% in June, and 20% in July. This distribution reflects the typical timing of snowmelt runoff in the Upper Colorado Basin.

Step 4: User Adjustments

The interactive forecast allows users to adjust two parameters:

These controls let users explore "what-if" scenarios without modifying the underlying model.

How Accurate Is It?

The model was validated by hindcasting five known water years (2020–2024). For each year, the model starts from the actual January elevation and April 1 SWE reading, then forecasts forward. Results are compared against observed peak (summer high) and trough (winter low) elevations.

Year Start Elev SWE Pred. Peak Actual Peak Peak Err Pred. Low Actual Low Low Err
20203600.24412 3619.63610.6+9.0 3598.63559.4+39.2*
20213566.23356 3566.23561.8+4.4 3531.33522.1+9.2
20223523.13662 3528.03539.5−11.5 3494.13519.5−25.4*
20233521.65527 3580.63584.3−3.7 3553.93557.6−3.7
20243558.44445 3583.53586.8−3.3 3557.43557.3+0.1

* 2020 and 2022 had atypical release rates. WY2021 released 8.28 MAF vs. the current 7.48 MAF tier; WY2022 was drought-reduced to 7.07 MAF. The model is calibrated for the current Mid-Elevation Release Tier (7.48 MAF/year).

Bottom line: Under current operating conditions (2023–2024), forecast errors are under 4 feet for both peak and low predictions. When release rates deviate significantly from the calibration period, errors can reach 25–40 ft — which is expected, since the model assumes current policy will continue.

Current 2026 Outlook

As of March 2026, Lake Powell sits at 3,529.4 ft with snowpack running at roughly 56% of the April 1 median. Under moderate assumptions, the model projects a low point around 3,488 ft by early 2027 — just below minimum power pool (3,490 ft).

This aligns directionally with the Bureau of Reclamation's own January 2026 24-Month Study, which projects 3,497 ft (most probable) to 3,479 ft (dry scenario) by end of 2026.

Limitations